{"id":2397,"date":"2018-10-28T21:35:44","date_gmt":"2018-10-28T20:35:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/?p=2397"},"modified":"2018-10-29T14:12:04","modified_gmt":"2018-10-29T13:12:04","slug":"female-identified-human-individuals-and-species-derogation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/female-identified-human-individuals-and-species-derogation\/","title":{"rendered":"Female-identified human individuals and species-derogation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_yegane_torsi_2c_small.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"970\" height=\"748\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2410\" src=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_yegane_torsi_2c_small.jpg\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_yegane_torsi_2c_small.jpg 970w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_yegane_torsi_2c_small-300x231.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_yegane_torsi_2c_small-768x592.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 970px) 100vw, 970px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Female-identified human individuals and speciesism, species-derogation, -negation -annihilation or the overlooked problem of \u201cwomen\u201d and anthropocentric-collectivist speciesism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Palang LY<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/meat_flesh_iconographic_rethorics_and_forms_of_sexism_c.pdf\">This text as a PDF<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A.) I set forth following anchor points, before I start on the topic:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>We can ask if the interpretations of the characteristics, that are considered to make up the marking dividers within a human-animal hierarchy, are in reality a negation of the autonomous value of otherness in nonhuman animals.<\/li>\n<li>We know that the single criterion [against which we measure anything nonhuman animals do] that serves as our standard, is the human parameter, i.e. the human model counts as the ideal, as the standard, for creating norms. So what happens if we put this standard of measurement into doubt?<\/li>\n<li>Biology has already determined what the identity of nonhuman animals is, and even the Animal Rights movement has satisfied itself with placing the moral question somewhere out of reach by accepting the explanation of the identity of animals as something strictly biological.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>(Full text: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/what-is-an-animal\/\">http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/what-is-an-animal\/<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/species-derogation_22a.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"306\" height=\"495\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2401\" src=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/species-derogation_22a.jpg\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/species-derogation_22a.jpg 306w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/species-derogation_22a-185x300.jpg 185w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 306px) 100vw, 306px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Source: unknown.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The image is severely speciesist. It\u2019s not fathomable why some feminists make that comparison between the \u201ctreatment\u201d or I guess rather the objectification of women in advertisement etc. with \u201cmeat\u201d? There is obviously an perverted aesthetical connection thought by speciesist rhetorics, but it leads us into a direction which should be further looked at and not just taken by the superficial \u201cmeaning\u201d of such iconography.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMeat\u201d is a solely speciesist problem, unless we would speak of necrophilia and cannibalism.<\/p>\n<p>B.) Feminism and Animal Rights: the one way or the other<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMeat\u201d is not porn and it\u2019s not sexist per se, it is porn insofar and forms of zoophilia are involved, direct or indirect, and sexist where sexism is directly applied to the nonhuman animal individuals or groups themselves. Speaking of porn and sexism here as a proxy covers up how those affect nonhumans directly.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMeat\u201d is flesh, and it\u2019s the result of a human\/humans killing a nonhuman animal\/animals.<\/p>\n<p>We should be careful with attaching own sociological issues to such a major own concerns such as Animal Rights in an analogy, which sets itself so close to the subject of comparison, that the story lapses and gets one-sided and a new and important perspective gets neglected instantaneously.<\/p>\n<p>All Animal Rights issues need an own valid terminology and frames of reference, otherwise we are risking to blur the lines of differentiation.<\/p>\n<p>The analogy of sexism and speciesism fails when applied superficially and in an undifferentiated way also because\u2026:<\/p>\n<p>Two main points why Animal Rights issues can\u2019t be tied to a strict feminist viewpoint, as long as feminism is used as excusing women from the ethical responsibilities in society towards their nonhuman environment.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It\u2019s wrong to presuppose that speciesism is something that is more prevalent in male-identified human individuals compared to female-identified human individuals.<\/li>\n<li>Also, male nonhuman animals are inasmuch sexually abused, e.g. in the farm industry (their reproductive system) such as female nonhuman animals are.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The sociological dynamics of gender in their effect of speciesist attitudes and actions should be addressed of course, but there is no reason inherent to \u201cbiological\u201d gender (if we would go that path) that would prove that \u201cmen\u201d or categorically more speciesist than \u201cwomen\u201d. Also the way in which roleplay is happening in systems of oppression should be addressed, i.e. \u201cwomen\u201d taking the role of cooks, or preparing the speciesist meals, of wearing feathers and fur, etc. male roles, roles that are swapped, (I am not extending on this here).<\/p>\n<p>C.) Close analogies \u2026 also of genocides and speciecides and their deficits<\/p>\n<p>These types of close analogies in the field of -isms and abuse work in a valid way when we look at the psychology of the perpetrator who seeks to create a victim: the aspect of exerted violence shares many similarities, whereas however on the side of the victimized we have to see the contexts: political, enviro-political, historical, sociological, \u2026 a group or an individual gets picked as a victim for reasons, and those exact reasons need to be analyzed under own terms, and not be conflated. In terms of speciesism, we face many forms of speciesism (i.e. religious, scientific, legal, philosophical, etc.).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"801\" height=\"800\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2400\" src=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small.png\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small.png 801w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/farangis_g_yegane_crown_of_the_creation_22a_small-768x767.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 801px) 100vw, 801px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>D.) Feminism, Speciesism, Anthropocentrism<\/p>\n<p>Random examples of female rhetorics of speciesism:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>objectification of beings oppressed, animalesque figures made with wool \/ felt; <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20160323101532\/https:\/www.stephaniemetz.com\/portfolioOverbredAnimals.html\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20160323101532\/https:\/\/www.stephaniemetz.com\/portfolioOverbredAnimals.html<\/a><\/li>\n<li>helplessness and helping as an act of public viewing, <a href=\"http:\/\/kathyhigh.com\/project-embracing-animal.html\">http:\/\/kathyhigh.com\/project-embracing-animal.html<\/a><\/li>\n<li>the daily randomness of the gender \/ nonhuman animal speciesist contexts, women taking\/being part, <a href=\"http:\/\/huzzahvintage.blogspot.com\/2010\/10\/you-decide.html\">http:\/\/huzzahvintage.blogspot.com\/2010\/10\/you-decide.html<\/a><\/li>\n<li>female-identified fans, adherents, students of Hermann Nitsch for example<\/li>\n<li>female speciesist artists in general, random examples with critical comments:\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/speciesism-sells-for-a-reason\">http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/speciesism-sells-for-a-reason<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/against-the-dignity-of-life\">http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/against-the-dignity-of-life<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/pesi-girschs-nature-morte\">http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/pesi-girschs-nature-morte<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/biologistic-arts-links\">http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/biologistic-arts-links<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/reduced-to-specimen\">http:\/\/www.farangis.de\/blog\/reduced-to-specimen<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Is a self-critical view on gender \/ being a woman \/ feminism necessary?<\/p>\n<p>What would speak against it? We know that in our daily lives we, as \u201cwomen\u201d, make decisions that touch on core grounds that turn the private\/the personal into the political (<a href=\"https:\/\/userpages.umbc.edu\/~korenman\/wmst\/pisp.html\">https:\/\/userpages.umbc.edu\/~korenman\/wmst\/pisp.html<\/a>). As antispeciesists we know with our vegan praxis just how impactful our personal choices are, and as social beings we also know how hard it can be for us to draw a line between the social expectations that one tries to fit in (in order to find a job, to be liked or accepted, to keep ones social ties or family structures\/felt obligations together, and so forth) and our political ideals and ethical, pressing necessities when both might stand in conflict with each other in times of societal change. Our human social environment might be heavily speciesist and we have to get along with it, somehow yet still inspire change, for instance.<\/p>\n<p>Speciesism, as remote as it seems, is to be found at the same point where <em>my-choice-to-decide-otherwise-or-not<\/em> crosses just any implications of socialization that I feel are ethically unjustifiable. When I rant against sexism I might as well rant against an injustice that targets nonhumans, if I am a vegan anti-speciesist minded person.<\/p>\n<p>Speciesism can be understood to work socially as an ideology, where people who are convinced of their degrading stance, believe in a collectively held fiction that is assumed and agreed upon as \u201cobjectivity\u201d, so that no rebuttal can take place on \u201crational grounds\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Women do feel at home in this construct inasmuch as men do, on the large scale. Both 50 percent of humanity, male and female, believe so much in human superiority that they are willing to constitute part of a speciesist society by fulfilling their individual part in the fiction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGender\u201d defines itself from interaction within a group or society. Being oppressed as a woman doesn\u2019t automatically mean that you can\u2019t be oppressive towards nonhuman animals. Drawing an analogy between sexism (or genderism) and speciesism does not take account of the different reasons and histories why the victim gets oppressed in the first place \u2013 for what ends, and how exactly. If we turn a blind eye on the gender specific functions of speciesism and anthropocentrism we might risk a loophole in our argumentation for our own rights defending nonhumans and for integral Animal Rights themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Speciesism is a <em>unique<\/em> tragedy. The history of being classified as \u201canimals\u201d by humans, with all that entailed, as beings whose existence had been on earth eons before humans evolved, can\u2019t be compared to any other form of oppression by a strict analogy. Being objectified as solely \u201canimate\u201d, being slaughterable, edible, huntable, vivisectable, being objectifiable and judged as \u201cdefinable\u201d, in the first place constitutes a specific situation for the affected subject, and hints at a <em>unique technique of injustice<\/em> taking place here on behalf of the oppressive side that is being applied to this particular victimized group.<\/p>\n<p>Comparisons between different forms of oppression are extensively helpless efforts when oppressor and oppressed are as entangled as in the case of speciesist human oppressive settings.<\/p>\n<p>We could straightforwardly name that natural sciences, religion, philosophy, mass society have to end classifying the beings we call \u201cnonhuman animals\u201d, or we stay stuck in our psychological accompliceship with the very hierarchical and oppressive systems that we criticize so vehemently as what regards our own pains.<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t see an alternative as of yet. The ecofeminist and feminist discourse in Animal Rights and Animal Liberation (Karen Davis, Marti Kheel, Lori Gruen, Carol J. Adams, Kim Socha, Vasile Stanescu and so forth) is pluralistic enough to lead and continue their differentiated discourse I believe and I thank them for doing so.<\/p>\n<p><em>Farangis G. Yegane. Panting: Torsi, Drawing: Werkzyklus Krone der Sch\u00f6pfung, <a href=\"http:\/\/crownofthecreation.farangis.de\/\">http:\/\/crownofthecreation.farangis.de\/<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>All links accessed 28.10.2018.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1b.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1349\" height=\"773\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2412\" src=\"http:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1c.png\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1c.png 1349w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1c-300x172.png 300w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1c-768x440.png 768w, https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/feminism_sexism_speciesism_1c-1024x587.png 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1349px) 100vw, 1349px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Female-identified human individuals and speciesism, species-derogation, -negation -annihilation or the overlooked problem of \u201cwomen\u201d and anthropocentric-collectivist speciesism Palang LY This text as a PDF A.) I set forth following anchor points, before I start on the topic: We can ask if the interpretations of the characteristics, that are considered to make up the marking dividers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[147,148,86,18,38],"tags":[46,66,65],"class_list":["post-2397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-animal-degradation-and-speciesism","category-fragments-on-species-derogation","category-nonhuman-rights-nonhuman-cultures","category-opinions","category-where-ethics-meet","tag-human-rights","tag-nonhuman-rights","tag-rights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2397"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2397"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2397\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2413,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2397\/revisions\/2413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.simorgh.de\/objects\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}