overview in short

Interesting when people defend humans from humans insistingly on the back of nonhumans. Refined speciesism. antibiologistic antispeciesist animal sociology
Why treat nonhuman concerns in assigned fields, instead of debiologizing the typical stances on animality? “Being a human” is still
Nonhumans are constantly put into a Kaspar Hauser-like situation, where it is assumed that imprisonment and deprival from > social
If a high in human ethics is inseparably accompanied by factual animal degradation coming in any form, then such ethics
Part of speciesist history in our society/ies is that critique of animal hatred, derogation, and so forth is muted. It
(QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF THE NON-DAIRY VEGETARIANS.) Price 2d. (Post free 3d.) Yearly Subscription 1/- NO. 1. NOVEMBER 1944. Also available
Activists that mention all ethical environmental and social issues except animal rights and speciesism. Sounds familiar? Let's make these awkward
Sentience stands in contexts, do you poke into the functionalities of a beings nervous system to analyze the “quality” of
Edibility in the case of the human-animal-relationship always goes along with the legitimization of “meat eating” via objectification of the
Criticizing human supremacism while practicing it? An animal sociology should in our view ideally be a system of full access